While the sales growth in electronic medical record (EMR) systems has been slower than anticipated due to confusion over vendor qualifications and federal guidelines, the EMR market did grow in 2010 and it should see much better years ahead, according to a report from Kalorama Information.
The value of the market for EMRs was about $15.7 billion in 2010, according to the New York-based healthcare market research company in its latest report, “EMR 2011: The Market for Electronic Medical Record Systems.”
The EMR growth rate in 2010 was 13.6 percent–just above the rate in 2009 (10 percent). These rates were less, though, than predicted by Kalorama researchers (it had predicted about a 15 percent growth for both years). However, the rates may be improving as physician adoption improves and more incentive checks for EMR adoption under meaningful use guidelines are sent out.
Kalorama is predicting that adoption and upgrading activities will be “brisk” in coming years. As new systems are sold, companies will earn revenues from existing clients in servicing and consulting–resulting in a market growth rate of 18 to 20 percent for the next two years.
“We think that while progress was made in physician adoption and in vendor sales, there is still a lot more potential,” said Bruce Carlson, publisher of Kalorama Information, in a statement. “There are still a considerable number of physicians who need to be fully functional and hospitals that have to improve their stage ranking.”
Source : http://www.emrspecialists.com/2011/03/emr-market-expected-to-increase-growth/
Showing posts with label Electronic Medical Record. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Electronic Medical Record. Show all posts
Thursday, June 9, 2011
Monday, May 2, 2011
Study: Most Americans support EMRs
CHICAGO – Seventy-eight percent of Americans favor the use of electronic medical records, according to a recent study by NORC at the University of Chicago, an independent research organization.
The study was published in the February edition of the journal HSR: Health Services Research.
Researchers say this report is different because most previous studies of EMRs have focused on the attitudes of clinicians or health organizations. Surprisingly few have focused on the attitudes of consumers toward health IT and, of those, none were based on a sample that fully represents the American people.
Key findings of the study are:
* Fifty-nine percent believe EMRs could reduce health costs
* Seventy-two percent support sharing of health care information among providers
* Eighty percent favored use of e-prescribing
* Seventy-nine percent thought that personal health records would help patients to be better informed about their health.
* Despite the fact that 48 percent of Americans are concerned about the privacy of medical records, fully 64 percent said that the benefits of EMRs outweigh privacy concerns
* The study also found that Americans aren’t without their reservations. Forty-four percent said they are not willing to pay to increase the use of health IT, and 57 percent said that use of health IT would make no difference in their choice of a physician.
Individuals with lower income and those who have less familiarity with electronic technology have less favorable attitudes towards health IT, the study found. Researchers say this implies that some of the populations that are most likely to benefit from health IT may be least open-minded about it.
“Our core finding is that a large majority of Americans support use of health IT to improve healthcare and safety, and reduce costs, which suggests that government and industry efforts to increase the effectiveness and use of health IT are generally consistent with the public’s wishes,” said Dan Gaylin, NORC’s executive vice president for Research, and the lead author of the study. “But there is still room for efforts to demonstrate the advantages of health IT among some important demographic groups.”
Source : http://www.emrspecialists.com/2011/02/study-most-americans-support-emrs/
The study was published in the February edition of the journal HSR: Health Services Research.
Researchers say this report is different because most previous studies of EMRs have focused on the attitudes of clinicians or health organizations. Surprisingly few have focused on the attitudes of consumers toward health IT and, of those, none were based on a sample that fully represents the American people.
Key findings of the study are:
* Fifty-nine percent believe EMRs could reduce health costs
* Seventy-two percent support sharing of health care information among providers
* Eighty percent favored use of e-prescribing
* Seventy-nine percent thought that personal health records would help patients to be better informed about their health.
* Despite the fact that 48 percent of Americans are concerned about the privacy of medical records, fully 64 percent said that the benefits of EMRs outweigh privacy concerns
* The study also found that Americans aren’t without their reservations. Forty-four percent said they are not willing to pay to increase the use of health IT, and 57 percent said that use of health IT would make no difference in their choice of a physician.
Individuals with lower income and those who have less familiarity with electronic technology have less favorable attitudes towards health IT, the study found. Researchers say this implies that some of the populations that are most likely to benefit from health IT may be least open-minded about it.
“Our core finding is that a large majority of Americans support use of health IT to improve healthcare and safety, and reduce costs, which suggests that government and industry efforts to increase the effectiveness and use of health IT are generally consistent with the public’s wishes,” said Dan Gaylin, NORC’s executive vice president for Research, and the lead author of the study. “But there is still room for efforts to demonstrate the advantages of health IT among some important demographic groups.”
Source : http://www.emrspecialists.com/2011/02/study-most-americans-support-emrs/
Wednesday, April 13, 2011
Patient-Centered Medical Home Requires an EMR System
Patient-centered medical homes have become all the rage in the healthcare industry these days. The big push is coming from payers who want to cut costs and provider organizations who want primary care physicians to have a bigger say in the care of their patients. No matter who is driving the financial and clinical model, the train isn’t leaving the station, so to speak, without health IT to power it.
At a primary-care practice in St. Louis, Mo., both patients and their families are seeing firsthand how an electronic medical record (EMR) system documents patient treatment and applies clinical decision support and analytics to tailor a patient’s treatment plan.
PCMHs are not all the same, and the Des Peres Internal Medicine office further personalizes treatment by having a nurse practitioner and social worker as part of the PCMH team. One of the Des Peres Internal Medicine physicians said that one of the goals of the PCMH is to increase patient access to care. That could mean access to the social worker via telephone. It also gives patients the extra channel of communicating or completing tasks such as making an appointment, filling a prescription or entering patient vitals via a patient portal.
One of the best benefits of an EMR in a PCMH is the streamlining of care delivery, which includes the elimination of duplicative tests. Most patients in a PCMH likely have multiple chronic conditions that a care team must manage. If patients see multiple specialists on their own, who is coordinating the care? Even if the coordination is done through a primary-care physician, without an EMR to aggregate data and document what happens in every specialist office, the amount of administrative and clinical paperwork would be overwhelming.
Another benefit is empowering patients, which can often translate into taking better care of themselves, especially when they have their up-to-date patient information available to them via the patient portal and clinical decision support and analytics to support their entire care team.
Source : http://www.emrspecialists.com/2011/02/patient-centered-medical-home-requires-an-emr-system/
At a primary-care practice in St. Louis, Mo., both patients and their families are seeing firsthand how an electronic medical record (EMR) system documents patient treatment and applies clinical decision support and analytics to tailor a patient’s treatment plan.
PCMHs are not all the same, and the Des Peres Internal Medicine office further personalizes treatment by having a nurse practitioner and social worker as part of the PCMH team. One of the Des Peres Internal Medicine physicians said that one of the goals of the PCMH is to increase patient access to care. That could mean access to the social worker via telephone. It also gives patients the extra channel of communicating or completing tasks such as making an appointment, filling a prescription or entering patient vitals via a patient portal.
One of the best benefits of an EMR in a PCMH is the streamlining of care delivery, which includes the elimination of duplicative tests. Most patients in a PCMH likely have multiple chronic conditions that a care team must manage. If patients see multiple specialists on their own, who is coordinating the care? Even if the coordination is done through a primary-care physician, without an EMR to aggregate data and document what happens in every specialist office, the amount of administrative and clinical paperwork would be overwhelming.
Another benefit is empowering patients, which can often translate into taking better care of themselves, especially when they have their up-to-date patient information available to them via the patient portal and clinical decision support and analytics to support their entire care team.
Source : http://www.emrspecialists.com/2011/02/patient-centered-medical-home-requires-an-emr-system/
Thursday, March 17, 2011
EMR Spending Expected to Double in 4 years
Government incentives for using electronic medical records will result in spending on systems doubling by 2015, according to a report by IDC Health Insights. However, the study notes that much of that growth will come closer to end of that projected period, because vendors are having trouble keeping up with the orders.
Total EMR spending, which is expected to grow from $1.9 billion in 2009 to $3.8 billion by 2015, is about twice the growth rate analysts are seeing over the health information technology market and the general IT market, said Judy Hanover, research director of provider IT strategies for the Framingham, Mass.-based market research company and co-author of the report.
The report notes that a separate IDC survey in August 2010 found that 44% of health care organizations plan to accelerate or aggressively accelerate their plans to deploy EMRs because of financial incentives in the 2009 economic stimulus package. The stimulus provided incentives of up to $44,000 under Medicare and nearly $64,000 under Medicaid for meaningful use of an EMR.
But this rapid deployment is causing a vendor backlog that has resulted in unanticipated delays of up to six months for some practices and hospitals. Hanover said this has been a bigger issue for inpatient system deployments, but analysts are starting to see it on the ambulatory side as well.
The authors of the report predicted that the largest chunk of EMR investments will come in 2015. Not only is the backlog expected to cause delays, but some physicians will put off purchasing until it gets closer to 2015, when incentives turn to penalties.
The forecast shows clinics and physician practices will spend $335 million on EMRs in 2011 and $490 million in 2015. Ambulatory EMR spending overall was $633 million in 2009 and is expected to reach $1.4 billion in 2015.
Making an early decision on an EMR will help ensure that staff members are available for its installation, Hanover said. Practices might want to consider looking at third-party vendors if their primary vendors are experiencing a backlog, she said. Many third parties can provide installation and training services with the help of the vendor, she said.
After 2015, vendors are expected to enter a “maintenance cycle” in which revenue will come mostly from replacement systems or upgrades. Not only could the government require EMRs to perform more functions than they do today to qualify for incentives, health system reform may have an impact.
“We do expect to see, as health care reform goes into effect, a massive consolidation in the provider community in terms of acquisitions and reductions in the total number of providers,” Hanover said. “And that will drive some replacements and upgrading and reinvestment in EMRs.”
Source : http://www.emrspecialists.com/2011/02/emr-spending-expected-to-double-in-4-years/
Total EMR spending, which is expected to grow from $1.9 billion in 2009 to $3.8 billion by 2015, is about twice the growth rate analysts are seeing over the health information technology market and the general IT market, said Judy Hanover, research director of provider IT strategies for the Framingham, Mass.-based market research company and co-author of the report.
The report notes that a separate IDC survey in August 2010 found that 44% of health care organizations plan to accelerate or aggressively accelerate their plans to deploy EMRs because of financial incentives in the 2009 economic stimulus package. The stimulus provided incentives of up to $44,000 under Medicare and nearly $64,000 under Medicaid for meaningful use of an EMR.
But this rapid deployment is causing a vendor backlog that has resulted in unanticipated delays of up to six months for some practices and hospitals. Hanover said this has been a bigger issue for inpatient system deployments, but analysts are starting to see it on the ambulatory side as well.
The authors of the report predicted that the largest chunk of EMR investments will come in 2015. Not only is the backlog expected to cause delays, but some physicians will put off purchasing until it gets closer to 2015, when incentives turn to penalties.
The forecast shows clinics and physician practices will spend $335 million on EMRs in 2011 and $490 million in 2015. Ambulatory EMR spending overall was $633 million in 2009 and is expected to reach $1.4 billion in 2015.
Making an early decision on an EMR will help ensure that staff members are available for its installation, Hanover said. Practices might want to consider looking at third-party vendors if their primary vendors are experiencing a backlog, she said. Many third parties can provide installation and training services with the help of the vendor, she said.
After 2015, vendors are expected to enter a “maintenance cycle” in which revenue will come mostly from replacement systems or upgrades. Not only could the government require EMRs to perform more functions than they do today to qualify for incentives, health system reform may have an impact.
“We do expect to see, as health care reform goes into effect, a massive consolidation in the provider community in terms of acquisitions and reductions in the total number of providers,” Hanover said. “And that will drive some replacements and upgrading and reinvestment in EMRs.”
Source : http://www.emrspecialists.com/2011/02/emr-spending-expected-to-double-in-4-years/
Wednesday, March 9, 2011
Medicare EMR Incentive Program Begins Registration
Washington — Starting Jan. 3, eligible physicians and hospitals will be able to register for the Medicare electronic medical record incentive program, a prerequisite for obtaining billions in available federal bonuses, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services announced Dec. 22, 2010.
Also starting Jan. 3, registration for the Medicaid EMR incentive program will launch for Alaska, Iowa, Kentucky, Louisiana, Oklahoma, Michigan, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee and Texas. In February, registration will open in California, Missouri and North Dakota. The remaining states probably will launch their Medicaid EMR incentive program sign-ups in the spring and summer, CMS said.
Officials with CMS and the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology said they hope for broad registration by doctors and hospitals. To prepare for the process, health professionals are encouraged to visit the CMS website (www.cms.gov/ehrincentiveprograms/).
“With the start of registration, these landmark programs get under way, and patients, providers and the nation can begin to enjoy the benefits of widespread adoption of electronic health records,” said CMS Administrator Donald M. Berwick, MD.
David Blumenthal, MD, the national health IT coordinator, said, “It’s time to get connected.”
He added that his office and CMS have numerous resources to help physicians and hospitals enroll in the program. They include a website that lists more than 130 certified EMR systems (onc-chpl.force.com/ehrcert/).
Another site lists the 62 regional extension centers that can assist physicians in obtaining the bonuses (healthit.hhs.gov/portal/server.pt/community/healthit_hhs_gov__rec_program/1495/).
Physicians who want to participate must register in either the Medicare or Medicaid EMR incentive programs. Participants must choose only one program — they cannot receive payments from both. However, after receiving a bonus for a given year, they may change their program selection once before 2015.
In 2010, CMS finalized standards that doctors and hospitals must meet to demonstrate meaningful use of their EMR systems. Physicians can receive as much as $44,000 over a five-year period through Medicare, and up to $63,750 over six years through Medicaid.
CMS on Dec. 22, 2010, announced several additional key 2011 dates for the EMR physician incentive program:
Also starting Jan. 3, registration for the Medicaid EMR incentive program will launch for Alaska, Iowa, Kentucky, Louisiana, Oklahoma, Michigan, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee and Texas. In February, registration will open in California, Missouri and North Dakota. The remaining states probably will launch their Medicaid EMR incentive program sign-ups in the spring and summer, CMS said.
Officials with CMS and the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology said they hope for broad registration by doctors and hospitals. To prepare for the process, health professionals are encouraged to visit the CMS website (www.cms.gov/ehrincentiveprograms/).
“With the start of registration, these landmark programs get under way, and patients, providers and the nation can begin to enjoy the benefits of widespread adoption of electronic health records,” said CMS Administrator Donald M. Berwick, MD.
David Blumenthal, MD, the national health IT coordinator, said, “It’s time to get connected.”
He added that his office and CMS have numerous resources to help physicians and hospitals enroll in the program. They include a website that lists more than 130 certified EMR systems (onc-chpl.force.com/ehrcert/).
Another site lists the 62 regional extension centers that can assist physicians in obtaining the bonuses (healthit.hhs.gov/portal/server.pt/community/healthit_hhs_gov__rec_program/1495/).
Physicians who want to participate must register in either the Medicare or Medicaid EMR incentive programs. Participants must choose only one program — they cannot receive payments from both. However, after receiving a bonus for a given year, they may change their program selection once before 2015.
In 2010, CMS finalized standards that doctors and hospitals must meet to demonstrate meaningful use of their EMR systems. Physicians can receive as much as $44,000 over a five-year period through Medicare, and up to $63,750 over six years through Medicaid.
CMS on Dec. 22, 2010, announced several additional key 2011 dates for the EMR physician incentive program:
- January — Some state agencies begin issuing Medicaid EMR incentive payments.
- April — Participants begin to attest eligibility for Medicare bonuses.
- May — CMS begins issuing Medicare bonuses.
- Oct. 3 — Physicians have a final chance to begin their 90-day reporting period to demonstrate meaningful use in 2011.
- Dec. 31 — 2011 bonus payment year ends for eligible professionals.
Friday, February 25, 2011
Hospitals Integrating Their Medical Devices and EMRs
A third of hospitals have integration between medical devices and electronic medical records, allowing data recorded on the devices to be uploaded automatically into EMR, according to a survey released Dec. 1 by HIMSS Analytics.
Most hospitals that have linked devices and EMRs said they believe it saves staff time by eliminating manual documentation.
HIMSS Analytics, part of the Chicago-based Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society, surveyed 825 U.S. hospitals on their use of medical device utilization. It found the devices most likely to be interfaced are intelligent medical device hubs (networked diagnostic equipment that provide data streams) and physiological monitors.
Recording and charting vital signs is one of the core measurements of stage 1 meaningful use. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services meaningful use incentives offer hospitals a base payment of $2 million each from Medicare and Medicaid. Although the stage 1 meaningful use criteria do not require the charting to be done automatically, many believe integration between medical devices and EMRs will be required later.
“The transfer of data directly from a medical device to the EMR can reduce potential medical errors and improve patient care, because no manual transfer of data takes place,” said John Daniels, vice president of health care organizational services for HIMSS. “Such data integration also improves workflow by saving time for clinical staff, a valuable benefit when looking at nursing shortages in health care.”
The report notes that hospitals are not yet conducting return-on-investment studies on the integration of the monitoring devices to EMRs. But some hospitals have reported that integration has saved time. St. John’s Medical Center in Jackson, Wyo., reports that integration of vital sign monitors to its EMRs has yielded a 60% time savings, because staff do not have to enter the data manually.
The report said a critical factor hospitals face is determining how to connect an intelligent medical device to an EMR.
For those that integrate some devices to an EMR, about half use a wired local area network to provide the connectivity. Only 8% rely solely on wireless LAN connections for the integration.
The report says hospitals will place more importance on integrating medical devices to EMRs when more is known about the stage 2 and stage 3 meaningful use requirements. The Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology is working on stage 2 criteria.
Source : http://www.emrspecialists.com/2011/01/hospitals-integrating-their-medical-devices-and-emrs/
Most hospitals that have linked devices and EMRs said they believe it saves staff time by eliminating manual documentation.
HIMSS Analytics, part of the Chicago-based Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society, surveyed 825 U.S. hospitals on their use of medical device utilization. It found the devices most likely to be interfaced are intelligent medical device hubs (networked diagnostic equipment that provide data streams) and physiological monitors.
Recording and charting vital signs is one of the core measurements of stage 1 meaningful use. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services meaningful use incentives offer hospitals a base payment of $2 million each from Medicare and Medicaid. Although the stage 1 meaningful use criteria do not require the charting to be done automatically, many believe integration between medical devices and EMRs will be required later.
“The transfer of data directly from a medical device to the EMR can reduce potential medical errors and improve patient care, because no manual transfer of data takes place,” said John Daniels, vice president of health care organizational services for HIMSS. “Such data integration also improves workflow by saving time for clinical staff, a valuable benefit when looking at nursing shortages in health care.”
The report notes that hospitals are not yet conducting return-on-investment studies on the integration of the monitoring devices to EMRs. But some hospitals have reported that integration has saved time. St. John’s Medical Center in Jackson, Wyo., reports that integration of vital sign monitors to its EMRs has yielded a 60% time savings, because staff do not have to enter the data manually.
The report said a critical factor hospitals face is determining how to connect an intelligent medical device to an EMR.
For those that integrate some devices to an EMR, about half use a wired local area network to provide the connectivity. Only 8% rely solely on wireless LAN connections for the integration.
The report says hospitals will place more importance on integrating medical devices to EMRs when more is known about the stage 2 and stage 3 meaningful use requirements. The Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology is working on stage 2 criteria.
Source : http://www.emrspecialists.com/2011/01/hospitals-integrating-their-medical-devices-and-emrs/
Tuesday, December 14, 2010
New York EMR Network Set To Be The Largest In The Country
NEW YORK – The New York Department of Health (DOH) and the public-private partnership New York eHealth Collaborative (NYeC) on Tuesday submitted a plan to ONC outlining a proposal to spend $129 million in state and federal funds to build and implement a statewide medical records network.
The network is being touted by officials as the country’s largest – connecting hundreds of hospitals, thousands of medical practitioners and up to 20 million patients a year. Once completed, New York doctors anywhere in the state will have instant access to critical Electronic Medical Records (EMR) of every patient.
“Better information helps doctors do a better job,” said David Whitlinger, executive director of NYeC. “This statewide network will empower healthcare providers by giving them access to a wealth of patient data that they didn’t always have at their fingertips. While cutting edge technology plays a tremendous role in modern medicine, in many respects medical records are still stuck in the past. We look forward to helping create a system that will greatly improve the quality of medical care and therefore people’s lives.”
The proposed statewide network will link together several existing regional electronic medical records networks with new infrastructure and programming, and state agencies will set policies to govern the system’s implementation and maintenance. Currently, healthcare providers can share some electronic records with certain neighboring medical institutions.
The Statewide Health Information Network for NY (SHIN-NY) will allow patients and healthcare providers to have immediate access to histories, prescriptions, test results, medical analysis and diagnoses, and more, anywhere in the state.
“Having this information can mean the difference between life and death,” said Eugene Heslin, a practicing New York physician who serves on the Board of NYeC. Heslin says having quick access to patients’ information such, as their medication history, can be life-saving in an emergency.
While several other states and the Veterans Administration have set up large networks for medical records, officials say New York’s system will ultimately dwarf them when completed given the scope of the state’s medical facilities. The proposal establishes a preliminary timeline for the implementation of many of the core services the network can provide – ranking them in priority – and foresees new services being added every several months between mid-2011 and 2014.
“New York is once again leading the nation in healthcare initiatives that will provide better treatment to the millions of patients treated in the state every year,” said New York State Department of Health Deputy Commissioner of Health Information Technology Transformation Rachel Block. “We feel it is our responsibility to help all patients and healthcare providers across the state have access to the same vital information that can help save lives. We look forward to working with NYeC and other state programs to create this network and establish rules that will make electronic medical records secure, accessible and helpful to the many stakeholders all around the state.”
Source : http://www.emrspecialists.com/2010/11/new-york-emr-network-set-to-be-the-largest-in-the-country/
The network is being touted by officials as the country’s largest – connecting hundreds of hospitals, thousands of medical practitioners and up to 20 million patients a year. Once completed, New York doctors anywhere in the state will have instant access to critical Electronic Medical Records (EMR) of every patient.
“Better information helps doctors do a better job,” said David Whitlinger, executive director of NYeC. “This statewide network will empower healthcare providers by giving them access to a wealth of patient data that they didn’t always have at their fingertips. While cutting edge technology plays a tremendous role in modern medicine, in many respects medical records are still stuck in the past. We look forward to helping create a system that will greatly improve the quality of medical care and therefore people’s lives.”
The proposed statewide network will link together several existing regional electronic medical records networks with new infrastructure and programming, and state agencies will set policies to govern the system’s implementation and maintenance. Currently, healthcare providers can share some electronic records with certain neighboring medical institutions.
The Statewide Health Information Network for NY (SHIN-NY) will allow patients and healthcare providers to have immediate access to histories, prescriptions, test results, medical analysis and diagnoses, and more, anywhere in the state.
“Having this information can mean the difference between life and death,” said Eugene Heslin, a practicing New York physician who serves on the Board of NYeC. Heslin says having quick access to patients’ information such, as their medication history, can be life-saving in an emergency.
While several other states and the Veterans Administration have set up large networks for medical records, officials say New York’s system will ultimately dwarf them when completed given the scope of the state’s medical facilities. The proposal establishes a preliminary timeline for the implementation of many of the core services the network can provide – ranking them in priority – and foresees new services being added every several months between mid-2011 and 2014.
“New York is once again leading the nation in healthcare initiatives that will provide better treatment to the millions of patients treated in the state every year,” said New York State Department of Health Deputy Commissioner of Health Information Technology Transformation Rachel Block. “We feel it is our responsibility to help all patients and healthcare providers across the state have access to the same vital information that can help save lives. We look forward to working with NYeC and other state programs to create this network and establish rules that will make electronic medical records secure, accessible and helpful to the many stakeholders all around the state.”
Source : http://www.emrspecialists.com/2010/11/new-york-emr-network-set-to-be-the-largest-in-the-country/
Thursday, November 11, 2010
Making Meaningful Transition To EMR
With the publication of the meaningful use guidelines on July 13, it is now clear what hospitals and doctors must demonstrate in their adoption of electronic medical records to grab a share of the billions of dollars available in federal incentives. Not as obvious, however, are the steps to take in negotiating this transition.
More than just the right technology, there must be a plan for preparing paper records and workflow processes for a “new normal,” where doctors will utilize both paper and electronic records to treat patients. The need for this “EMR enablement” work has been mostly lost amid the discussion of what technology milestones hospitals must hit and by when.
Hospitals that correctly complete this preparatory stage will realize three benefits: a more efficient records management program that returns cost savings to apply toward EMR; a better-organized records system that makes EMR implementation easier; and improved workflows for treating patients with hardcopy and digital records. Below are key EMR-enablement steps:
Centralize paper records for better access and lower costs
Today, most hospitals have patient records and films bottled up in specific departments, with no ability to share this information across the entire organization. In many cases, this produces unnecessary duplication of records and inconsistent management processes. Consolidating hardcopy patient records and films and then re-engineering how the organization stores and uses them can save time, cut costs and improve the quality of care through faster access to patient data. These new workflows need to account for how organizations archive, use and protect patient records in paper and electronic form. Stop saving – and paying for – outdated and duplicate records
Going digital does not mean digitizing every patient record. A thoughtful approach – what to digitize versus what can remain paper-based or securely destroyed – is required to reduce costs and improve care. A study from the American Health Information Management Association found that more than half of U.S. hospitals keep medical records forever, a behavior driven by the twin forces of industry regulations like HIPPA and state retention laws. Hospitals should comb through their records and destroy duplicates as well as those records past state-mandated retention periods. Destroying these outdated files and redundant copies cuts storage costs and makes digitization more cost-effective. Begin your EMR journey with the right records
Make no mistake: paper records are not going to disappear any time soon. A portion of the physical patient record will continue to exist and grow at least in the near term. Information technology will certainly change how records are accessed and stored, but paper will continue to coexist with electronic information in a so-called “hybrid” record environment for many years to come. An intelligent approach to digitizing records will control costs and change how documents are shared and protected, improving workflow-based functions like billing, coding, and chart completion. Records can be shared simultaneously by many different departments instead of being handed off piece-by-piece to complete these functions. Scanning only what is needed as it is needed – and not just scanning every record, or even the entire record – ensures that the investment in an EMR is on par with treatment requirements, using patient history and clinical needs as criteria for conversion.
The opportunities of moving to the EMR are great. By addressing the core issues of what (and how) information needs to be stored, accessed and protected, healthcare providers can develop a more efficient pathway to the EMR and, in the process, deliver the patient care and cost savings benefits promised by this transition.
Source : http://www.emrspecialists.com/2010/10/making-meaningful-transition-to-emr/
Hospitals that correctly complete this preparatory stage will realize three benefits: a more efficient records management program that returns cost savings to apply toward EMR; a better-organized records system that makes EMR implementation easier; and improved workflows for treating patients with hardcopy and digital records. Below are key EMR-enablement steps:
Centralize paper records for better access and lower costs
Today, most hospitals have patient records and films bottled up in specific departments, with no ability to share this information across the entire organization. In many cases, this produces unnecessary duplication of records and inconsistent management processes. Consolidating hardcopy patient records and films and then re-engineering how the organization stores and uses them can save time, cut costs and improve the quality of care through faster access to patient data. These new workflows need to account for how organizations archive, use and protect patient records in paper and electronic form. Stop saving – and paying for – outdated and duplicate records
Going digital does not mean digitizing every patient record. A thoughtful approach – what to digitize versus what can remain paper-based or securely destroyed – is required to reduce costs and improve care. A study from the American Health Information Management Association found that more than half of U.S. hospitals keep medical records forever, a behavior driven by the twin forces of industry regulations like HIPPA and state retention laws. Hospitals should comb through their records and destroy duplicates as well as those records past state-mandated retention periods. Destroying these outdated files and redundant copies cuts storage costs and makes digitization more cost-effective. Begin your EMR journey with the right records
Make no mistake: paper records are not going to disappear any time soon. A portion of the physical patient record will continue to exist and grow at least in the near term. Information technology will certainly change how records are accessed and stored, but paper will continue to coexist with electronic information in a so-called “hybrid” record environment for many years to come. An intelligent approach to digitizing records will control costs and change how documents are shared and protected, improving workflow-based functions like billing, coding, and chart completion. Records can be shared simultaneously by many different departments instead of being handed off piece-by-piece to complete these functions. Scanning only what is needed as it is needed – and not just scanning every record, or even the entire record – ensures that the investment in an EMR is on par with treatment requirements, using patient history and clinical needs as criteria for conversion.
The opportunities of moving to the EMR are great. By addressing the core issues of what (and how) information needs to be stored, accessed and protected, healthcare providers can develop a more efficient pathway to the EMR and, in the process, deliver the patient care and cost savings benefits promised by this transition.
Source : http://www.emrspecialists.com/2010/10/making-meaningful-transition-to-emr/
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)